Vermont Wrestling
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Home
Help
Search
Calendar
Members
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Login
Register
Vermont Wrestling
»
High School Wrestling
»
General Discussion
»
New Englands
Wrestling Websites
NH Wrestling
MA Wrestling
ME Wrestling Forum
ME Wrestling
Vermont
MAU
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
Author
Topic: New Englands (Read 2133 times)
Active members:
verge(1)
vtfan8(1)
lionwrestling(1)
CharlotteVT(1)
warp57(3)
69 mustang(5)
CoachOMeara(7)
speed622(7)
saber42(8)
takedown(8)
saber42
Newbie
Posts: 19
Karma: +0/-0
New Englands
«
on:
March 07, 2010, 04:55:45 PM »
Other than Steve Rich from Spaulding, who we are all very proud of, as all of you know, we did not have to good of a showing as a State. I would like to get some thought on how can we improve this? I realize we have many obstacles such as distance, etc. Our wrestlers are just as strong, just as fast, just as smart as any of those wrestlers from the other states. Our kids work just as hard or in many cases harder. Do we need to have more clinics throughout the off season? Do we need to think about having regional practices once a week? I suppose people would say, well we also want to win states, gee if I wrestle with my opponents, they might learn things I do? I think that is true but it would work both ways. Let the chips fall where they fall. The overall level of wrestling would improve for everyone. I certainly don't have the answers and that is why I wish we would have some good healthy discussion on the matter. Any ideas?
Logged
Vermont Wrestling
New Englands
«
on:
March 07, 2010, 04:55:45 PM »
takedown
Newbie
Posts: 14
Karma: +0/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #1 on:
March 07, 2010, 08:11:28 PM »
Distance, come on we don't travel that far. Regional practices, what is that? It starts with our youth and middle school kids. We need to stop treating this sport with all this Vermont b/s, and do what the other states do...Wrestle! This sport is one of the toughest, if not the toughest sport and the kids need to realize that. Practice hard during the on and off season. FREESTYLE, its time we start having some tournaments during the offseason. TEAM VERMONT at FARGO, come on who doesn't want to go? There are no obstacles except the ones we create. I said it once and I will say it again it is time for some changes. k-8 make it a club non school affilated. Wrestle by age not grade. Wrestle during the regular wrestling season. Have more dual meets and keep team score at tournaments. This will open the door to our out of state competitors, the ones how are kicking our butt. Do you see the picture? It will prepare us for the High School level. Wrestle out of the state, go to camps, mix up your practices, etc...
Logged
saber42
Newbie
Posts: 19
Karma: +0/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #2 on:
March 07, 2010, 09:11:16 PM »
Not sure what you mean by all this Vermont b/s but anyway thanks for the imput. Not sure our kids don't realize it is one of the toughest sports. I wreslted in another state where wrestling is pretty big. I have had the occassion to see some of the different schools practice in NY and Wisconsin. The practices I have seen at different schools here in VT were just as tough.
You do bring up some good ideas though. Many kids work off season but your right, we need to do more. I like the idea of the feeder programs, different tournaments and mixing it up some. More dual meets is great.
What I meant by regional practices is that many of our scchools currently have few wrestlers. In time hopefully those feeder programs would help resolve that problem. If several teams got together even once a week, similiar to what we do once or twice with our New England qualifiers the week before New Englands, it would give the wrestlers a chance to battle it our with some tougher competition more often than just at tournaments. Not every school has two full teams like Mt Anthony is fortunate to have. Maybe that is a crazy idea but it is just a thought. that is the purpose of this discussion to bring out some positive ideas
Thanks for your ideas and I hope others will jump in with some.
Logged
takedown
Newbie
Posts: 14
Karma: +0/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #3 on:
March 08, 2010, 09:04:54 PM »
What I mean by the Vermont b/s is that know one wants to make changes, everyone is a winner mentality, and the idea that Vermont wrestling can compete with other states. Obviously we can't and you and I agree that changes need to happen. All we have to do is get some others on board. As you can see many are reading these posts, but are scared or are in denial of what needs to be done.
I ,also , did not grow up or wrestle in VT. I have been involved with wrestling for 24 years and wrestled for 14 of those years. So, I know what practices and good/great competition is all about.
Please do not get me wrong there are great athletes and coaches in VT, we just need to improve/fix a broken system.
Logged
CoachOMeara
Newbie
Posts: 17
Karma: +2/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #4 on:
March 09, 2010, 01:42:30 PM »
Obviously this was a poor showing for VT. Here are some of my observations. Based on the number of schools that compete in high school wrestling throughout New England, our results are not that surprising. Based on the numbers I could find, it looks like there are about 460 high schools total, and Vermont has 23. Our 23 is pretty heavily weighted with very small teams, and I am not sure if that is true for the school numbers I got around New England. Regardless, based on a simple ratio of our schools to the total, we should place about 4 kids per year. This year we had one, last year three, and the two previous years we had 6 each. This gives us an average over the last four years of four place winners per year.
I do agree that we need to get better as a state, and I think one way that will happen is if we increase the number of participating schools. I am not sure how we go about this, but I think it is the best way to make VT wrestling better. The more schools we have, the shorter the traveling would be as well. There is no question that southern New England has a huge advantage in short travel times for quality competition. This is something that we witness with Mt. Anthony as well. They are very close to quality NY teams and events. That close proximity helps build a wrestling buzz for a region of schools. Maine has had poor showings the last couple of years as well, and I really think that it has a lot to do with the density of wrestling high schools. It is one of the reasons why southern NH/ME is much better than central/northern NH/ME.
I would also like to say that if you have an idea for making the state better, then go for it. VT has very few regulations with regards to clubs, or youth wrestling. If you want to host a summer tournament, do it! You don't need anyone's permission. If you want to create a club team for youth or JH, go for it, there is nothing stopping you. Let me ask what you think are the major limitations imposed on the wrestling community are? Most of the suggestions you made can be done by anyone running a program, or hosting a tournament. Wrestling by age is the only one that might be a problem, though I don't think that is impacting our numbers or quality. For example NH wrestles by grade. How many tournaments have you hosted during season and in the off-season?? Do you schedule more dual meets for your team? Have you implemented your suggestions in your own program?
Darren O'Meara
Spaulding/BYSA/Barre Wrestling Club
Logged
speed622
Newbie
Posts: 25
Karma: +0/-1
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #5 on:
March 10, 2010, 01:55:18 AM »
The only thing that bothers me about youth program is they cant throw standing head locks. what kind of bull crap is that? how are these kids supose to compete with other states if they cant learn a head lock more important, how to defend a head lock. it makes me sick. i am not saying i am a head lock guy because i shoot with the best of them, but there is no higher crime then not leting kids throw head locks. its like kids not being allowed to hit home runs in little league, what out of state teams want to come to a vermont youth tourny really? there compittion is obvisouly alot better. other states laugh at us, Robert hamlin is not entering that gym, james bean is not entering that gym, neither is rob labrake corey green tj maroney are not coming thru those doors . what am i saying? Vermont greats are gone, am i saying that there will be one in the near future? maybe but prolly not (i am just being real). so what do we need to do? suck it up ( i am not saying every one needs to) but there are some of that do. and we know who they are. what is the soultion? go to more out of state tourneys go to new jersey go to mass. there no rule in the hand book that you have to attend 3 or 4 vermont tourneys. mount anthony only goes to 1. ( and dont give me the bull crap about money if school dont want to fund have fund rasiers in the off season have the parents help out) no exuses why we cant go compete some where else if you really want to you will. and regional pratices screw that, if a kid wants to come pratice with my team he can wear my team singlet and he can score my team points. (and dont give me the bull crap that he cant change schools for this reason and that if he wants to and teams want him and his parents are invested for the greater good ) they will get him on a team where he can improve. thats like having a combined foot ball pratice. why dont Rutland and Middlebury conjoin there foot ball pratices. and it will be good pratice! and i agree join one of the clubs vergens has a club barre has a club. but here in lies the problem with that. these kids are lazy (not all). they make exuses "iv got to much home work " they dont hit the weight room i bet out of the 42 kids we send to new englands i bet half hit the weight room and about out of that number i bet half of those kids hit the weight room like your supose to. did you see how strong all the kids were at new englands. they all hit the weights.
so you can do 2 things about what i wrote a. take my advice for what it is.B. get all offended and try to dissagree with me. i am open if you have more things you would like to talk about, but there is really no reason to disagree with me, because in this fact i know i am not wrong.
Logged
CoachOMeara
Newbie
Posts: 17
Karma: +2/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #6 on:
March 10, 2010, 10:15:08 AM »
I don't have strong feelings about the headlock rule, but I have serious doubts about it's effect on our performance at New Englands at the high school level.
The reality is that less than 75% of our youth kids make it to JH and probably less than half of those make it to high school. We are losing kids to other sports and the XBOX before they even reach high school. We need more participation in JH and high school wrestling. I am amazed at how willing people are to help out at the youth level, but no one wants to do JH. I have seen several youth teams with half a dozen coaches, but that same program cannot find a person to do JH. We have to ask why that is.
Logged
CoachOMeara
Newbie
Posts: 17
Karma: +2/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #7 on:
March 10, 2010, 10:49:00 AM »
BTW, I noticed that VT had 8 place winners at JH New Englands, and 3 champions, Which is on par with (if not better than) where we should be given the number of JH teams and wrestlers in VT. Also, NH is going through some of the same types of discussions right now on their forum, "why is MA kicking our butts". I think much of it has to do with shear numbers.
http://www.nhwrestling.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5055
Logged
CoachOMeara
Newbie
Posts: 17
Karma: +2/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #8 on:
March 10, 2010, 11:07:23 AM »
I got this from mass wrestling.
Total Medal Count:
MA: 41 (10, 10, 5, 2, 9, 5)
CT: 16 (2, 1, 1, 7, 1, 4)
RI: 12 (1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 4)
NH: 8 (1, 1, 4, 0, 1, 1)
ME: 6 (0, 0, 2, 3, 1, 0)
VT: 1 (0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Based on these number, RI had the best finish based on # of schools, followed by MA, NH, CT, ME, and VT. RI and MA were way above where they should have been.
CT, ME and VT all placed less wrestlers than they should have based on the number of wrestling schools. ME and VT were far below where they should have been.
Logged
saber42
Newbie
Posts: 19
Karma: +0/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #9 on:
March 10, 2010, 01:31:15 PM »
Coach Omeara
Being a coach, I was wondering what your thoughts were to adding one more tournament that the kids could go to during the season . I believe it is 7 right now. It would give schools another opportunity to hit another out of state tournament as the one person mentioned would be good. And if your thought was positive, how would we be able to do that. Who makes that decision.
To all thanks for the ideas and feedback It has already given me an idea or two to mention to our school coach for his thoughts and possible implementation Anyone else out there, please if you have ideas or thoughts, share them.
Logged
speed622
Newbie
Posts: 25
Karma: +0/-1
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #10 on:
March 10, 2010, 02:42:11 PM »
i agree we are loosing to many kids to the xbox and the ps3. but how can you not have strong feelings about the head lock rule? i want people to count how many out of states team go to there youth tourment. and it could have a differnce how we do aganst other state not not but in 10 years. the rule needs to change, its a bad rule.
Logged
CoachOMeara
Newbie
Posts: 17
Karma: +2/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #11 on:
March 10, 2010, 03:03:27 PM »
Most teams are already wrestling out of state tournaments, and staying within the seven tournament rule. Here are the list of in-state tournaments, St. J, Otter Valley, Middlebury, Essex, Mt. Anthony, Colchester, and Mt. Mansfield. Many of these tournaments feature out of state competition as well. I am sure that no team is competing in all of these tournaments as of now, so I doubt changing the number of allowable tournaments would effect most schedules. Also, many programs are going to large duals to get out of state competition.
Regardless of how you feel, the headlock rule is not responsible for our poor high school new england showing. Many of those athletes never had the rule when they were in youth anyway. The JH athletes have been effected by the rule more than any other group probably, and their showing at JH new englands was very good. No out of state teams go to our youth tournaments, because we have never invited them, with the exception of Mt. Anthony. Mt. Anthony has a very competitive youth tournament with out of state teams, as could anyone hosting a youth tournament if they chose to advertise and attract those teams. Also, many out of state youth programs have ended by the time the Vermont youth tournaments start. The headlock rule is not discouraging out of state teams from coming to VT, as far as I know. I am sure most out of state coaches are unaware of our headlock rule anyway. Has an out of state coach communicated to you that they were not attending our tournaments due to this rule?
Logged
CoachOMeara
Newbie
Posts: 17
Karma: +2/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #12 on:
March 10, 2010, 03:06:15 PM »
The only way to change the allowable tournaments would be through the VPA. This would be the kind of issue to bring up at the spring coaches meeting if people want it addressed.
Logged
takedown
Newbie
Posts: 14
Karma: +0/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #13 on:
March 10, 2010, 07:53:52 PM »
First thing first, most NH tournaments that we travel to as well as MA go by age. Second, yes the state does limit us for example a wrestler is only allowed to wrestle 5 matches a day. If we were usa that would not be the case. Third, I have mixed feelings about the headlock rule. For the reason it forces kids to WRESTLE, however, I like the idea of having it at states. Fourth, I don't like how the youth states are held. What happen to one bracket per a weight and age. As a state we can't even send 5 novice kids to New England's, b/c of when our season starts. This again is the b/s that I have mentioned. Look at NY, PA, NJ, VA, NH, MA, RI, CT...and so on. They all have the same problems with kids and their video games and lazy parents, but somehow they are able to build great wrestling programs and wrestlers. We loose kids at the JR level b/c lack of coaches, mat time, and think about it, it is only two grades. If we were to merge the programs from k-8 that might have a bigger impact, and in return give more depth in the H.S.
Teams from out of state don't come to our tournaments b/c their season is over. Those that go to Mt. Anthony's tournament go b/c they love to wrestle, and oh it is a qualifier for Gen Mills. All I am reading and hearing from everyone in the VT wrestling community is excuses to why we can't make changes. Yes, one person / team can implement these changes but whose to say the rest of VT will follow. We need to unit and do this together and not be scared of whose feelings will be hurt. TAKE A LOOK AT ALL 49 OTHER STATES, THERE IS A REASON WHY THEY DO THINGS THE WAY THEY DO.
Logged
saber42
Newbie
Posts: 19
Karma: +0/-0
Re: New Englands
«
Reply #14 on:
March 10, 2010, 09:58:06 PM »
what about allowing 7th and 8th graders to be part of our high school teams like they do in other states like NY and Mass? This would help smaller schools fill weight classes and would get a lot more wrestling in for our JH kids. THoughts?
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
« previous
next »
Vermont Wrestling
»
High School Wrestling
»
General Discussion
»
New Englands